Home Front: Tax breaks pile up for homebuyers
jwasserman@sacbee.com
Published Friday, Feb. 20, 2009
CLOSE: #story_header
Major housewarming
gifts worth thousands of dollars are piling up for Sacramento-area
couples and singles who buy a house in 2009.
Homebuyer tax breaks, which surfaced in the 1970s to stimulate buying, are back.
Thursday's
new California budget provides a $10,000 state tax credit to people who
buy a new house soon. And the $787 billion stimulus bill signed Tuesday
by President Obama gives an $8,000 federal tax credit to first-timers
buying new or resale homes. Some homebuyers this year can set
themselves up for $18,000 off their taxes.
Here are
details of the state tax break for new houses and condominiums
(provided by Senate Bill 15 X2 over the weekend, an incentive to get a
Republican budget vote from Sen. Roy Ashburn, R-Bakersfield):
• It applies to new California houses or condos bought as primary residences between March 1, 2009, and March 1, 2010.
• It's for 5 percent of the purchase price or $10,000, whichever is lower.
• The state will take $3,333 off a buyer's state taxes starting in the year of purchase and for two following years.
• The owner must live in the new home or condo for two years or lose the break.
• Collectively, the state tax break is limited to $100 million. At $10,000 per tax break that's 10,000 new dwellings.
Last year, builders started 65,380 homes and condos, and some are still unsold. Getting those sold is partly the purpose.
But
the measure is also about new construction jobs, new homebuyers going
to stores and local governments reaping higher property taxes, said
Dennis Rogers, an executive with a Roseville-based home builder trade
group, the North State Building Industry Association. He said the
building industry has worked for a year to get a state tax credit for
buyers. In the end it came as part of a budget deal.
A
legislative analysis of the Ashburn bill said, "It is likely the full
$100 million would be reserved before the end of 2009, perhaps in the
first few months of availability."
In other words: first come, first served.
Here, too, are details of the new federal tax break for first-time homebuyers that went into effect Tuesday:
• It's for new and existing homes purchased between Jan. 1 and Dec. 1, 2009.
• Buyers get a tax break equal to 10 percent of the purchase price, up to $8,000.
•
It does not have to be repaid. (Last year, buyers got $7,500 tax
credits for homes bought between April 9, 2008, and Jan. 1, 2009, but
had to repay over 15 years, interest-free).
• Singles must earn less than $75,000 a year. Married couples can qualify with joint annual incomes up to $150,000.
Originally,
a more ambitious stimulus bill pushed by Democrats called for $15,000
in first-time buyer tax credits. But it got whacked to $8,000 in talks
with Democrat and Republican holdouts.
"We were hoping for
$15,000, but this is fine, too," said Sara Cabrey, 25, one of the first
capital-area buyers to qualify. She got keys to her first house this
week in Tahoe Park.
***************************************************
Final score: $8,000 for homebuyers
First-time purchasers get a tax credit windfall if they buy before December.
By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: February 17, 2009: 12:13 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- There's a nice windfall for some
homebuyers in the economic stimulus bill awaiting President Obama's
signature on Tuesday. First-time buyers can claim a credit worth $8,000
- or 10% of the home's value, whichever is less - on their 2008 or 2009
taxes.
A big plus is that the credit is refundable, meaning tax
filers see a refund of the full $8,000 even if their total tax bill -
the amount of witholding they paid during the year plus anything extra
they had to pony up when they filed their returns - was less than that
amount. But there has been a lot of confusion over this provision. Adam
Billings of Knoxville, Tenn. wrote to CNNMoney.com asking:
"I
will qualify as a first-time home buyer, and I am currently set to get
a small tax refund for 2008. Does that mean if I purchased now that I
would get an extra $8,000 added on top of my current refund?"
The
short answer? Yes, Billings would get back the $8,000 plus what he'd
overpaid. The long answer? It depends. Here are three scenarios:
Scenario 1:
Your final tax liability is normally $6,000. You've had taxes withheld
from every paycheck and at the end of the year you've paid Uncle Sam
$6,000. Since you've already paid him all you owe, you get the entire
$8,000 tax credit as a refund check.
Scenario 2: Your
final tax liability is $6,000, but you've overpaid by $1,000 through
your payroll witholding. Normally you would get a $1,000 refund check.
In this scenario, you get $9,000, the $8,000 credit plus the $1,000 you
overpaid.
Scenario 3: Your final tax liability is $6,000,
but you've underpaid through your payroll witholding by $1,000.
Normally, you would have to write the IRS a $1,000 check. This time,
the first $1,000 of the tax credit pays your bill, and you get the
remaining $7,000 as a refund.
To qualify for the credit, the
purchase must be made between Jan. 1, 2009 and Nov. 30, 2009. Buyers
may not have owned a home for the past three years to qualify as "first
time" buyer. They must also live in the house for at least three years,
or they will be obligated to pay back the credit.
Additionally,
there are income restrictions: To qualify, buyers must make less than
$75,000 for singles or $150,000 for couples. (Higher-income buyers may
receive a partial credit.)
Applying for the credit will be easy -
or at least as easy as doing your income taxes. Just claim it on your
return. No other forms or papers have to be filed. Taxpayers who have
already completed their returns can file amended returns for 2008 to
claim the credit.
Lukewarm reception
The
housing industry is somewhat pleased with the result because the
stimulus plan improves on the current $7,500 tax credit, which was
passed in July and was more of a low-interest loan than an actual credit. But the industry was also disappointed that Congress did not go even further and adopt the Senate's proposal of a $15,000 non-refundable credit for all homebuyers.
"[The
Senate version] would have done a lot more to turn around the housing
market," said Bernard Markstein, an economist and director of
forecasting for the National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB). "We
have a lot of reports of people who would be coming off the fence
because of it."
Even so, the $8,000 credit will bring an
additional 300,000 new homebuyers into the market, according to
estimates by Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association
of Realtors.
The credit could also create a domino effect, he
said, because each first-time homebuyer sale will lead to two more
trade-up transactions down the line. "I think there are many homeowners
who would be trading-up but they have had no buyers for their own
homes," Yun said.
Who won't benefit, according to Mark Goldman, a
real estate lecturer at San Diego State University, are those
first-time homebuyers struggling to come up with down payments. The
credit does not help get them over that hurdle - they still have to
close the sale before claiming the bonus.
One state, Missouri, is
trying to get around that problem by creating a short-term loan on the
tax credit of up to $6,750. The state would loan borrowers the money so
they could use it at closing as part of the downpayment. Then, when the
buyers receive their tax credit from the IRS, they pay back the state.
Other states may follow with similar programs, according to NAHB's
Dietz.
Many may look at the tax credit as a discount on the home
price, according to Yun. A $100,000 purchase effectively becomes a
$92,000 one. That can reassure buyers apprehensive about purchasing and
then watching prices continue falling, he added.
And it provides
a nice nest egg for the often-difficult early years of homeownership,
when unexpected repairs and expenses often crop up. Recipients could
also use the money to buy new stuff for their home - a lawnmower, a
rug, a sofa - and, in that way, help stimulate the economy.
CORRECTED:
An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated how much taxpayers
who were owed a refund would receive under the credit. 